OSHA has inspected Eps Doublet 2 times in Colorado since 2015.
The latest one began on Mar 1, 2017 as part of a related case, in Denver.
Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 3 serious and 4 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $7,487 and now stand at $4,760, 36% lower after settlements or reviews.
Respiratory protection comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1910.134.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Eps Doublet averages $2,380 (2 cited inspections).
Colorado · latest 90 days of OSHA records
135employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Colorado: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Colorado
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Eps Doublet and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company4945 Lima St., Denver, CO 80239 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1) · Woodworking machinery |
Serious | $5,387 | $3,500 | Apr 26, 2017 | Final |
4690 Joilet St, Denver, CO 80239 · Sign Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $2,100 | $1,260 | May 15, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $0 | $0 | May 15, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | May 15, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | May 15, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1c 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | May 15, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1d 29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | May 15, 2015 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i)
(5) Transportation. (i) Chemical manufacturers, importers, or distributors shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals leaving the workplace is labeled, tagged, or marked in accordance with this section in a manner which does not conflict with the requirements of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.) and regulations issued under that Act by the Department of Transportation (49 CFR subtitle B).
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii)
(ii) The label for bulk shipments of hazardous chemicals must be on the immediate container, transmitted with the shipping papers or the bills of lading, or, with the agreement of the receiving entity, transmitted by technological or electronic means so that it is immediately available to workers in printed form on the receiving end of shipment.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)
(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Colorado the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.