Inspection 347193278 OPENED JAN 4, 2024Closed
1189 Pipeline Place, Wesley Chapel, FL 33543 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
OSHA has inspected Esmel Construction Inc 5 times in Florida since 2018.
The latest one began on Jan 4, 2024 to follow up on an earlier case, in Wesley Chapel.
Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 4 serious, 3 repeat and 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $69,505 and now stand at $37,340, 46% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Esmel Construction Inc averages $9,335 (4 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites Esmel Construction Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1189 Pipeline Place, Wesley Chapel, FL 33543 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
13845 Rangeland Blvd., Odessa, FL 33556 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $30,037 | $15,018 | Feb 12, 2021 | Final |
1189 Pipeline Place, Wesley Chapel, FL 33543 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $11,382 | $5,691 | Jan 7, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Repeat | $10,347 | $5,174 | Jan 7, 2019 | Final |
3507 N Tampa St, Tampa, FL 33618 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $5,174 | $5,174 | May 23, 2018 | Final |
4505 Hudson Ln, Tampa, FL 33618 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $5,174 | $2,587 | Apr 17, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $5,174 | $2,587 | Apr 17, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,217 | $1,108 | Apr 17, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 17, 2018 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15)
(15) Ladders shall be inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after any occurrence that could affect their safe use.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.