Salt Lake City, Utah · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
Since 2011, OSHA inspectors have visited Exceptional Roofing in Utah 4 times.
The most recent inspection opened on May 2, 2025 on a referral, in Salt Lake City.
In all, OSHA issued 8 citation items: 7 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $12,200; today they stand at $10,100, 17% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 3 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,078 penalty. Exceptional Roofing averages $3,367 across 3 cited inspections.
Want to know if OSHA cites Exceptional Roofing again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company4715 South 1300 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84117 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,100 | $1,050 | Jul 2, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $2,100 | $1,050 | Jul 2, 2025 | Final |
5807 Hillstone Dr., South Jordan, UT 84095 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Jun 22, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Jun 22, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 25, 2020 | Final |
2400 Karren St., Holladay, UT 84117 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Jul 7, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.502(k)(5) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 7, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Jul 7, 2020 | Final |
209 E 500 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)
(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(5)
(5) The fall protection plan shall document the reasons why the use of conventional fall protection systems (guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems, or safety nets systems) are infeasible or why their use would create a greater hazard.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.