OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Fernando Escamilla: OSHA inspections and violations

Corpus Christi, Texas · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
3citation items
$2,493current penalties
Dec 20, 2017last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited Fernando Escamilla in Texas one time.

It opened on Dec 20, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Corpus Christi.

In all, OSHA issued 3 citation items: 3 serious.

The proposed penalties came to $4,155; today they stand at $2,493, 40% less.

The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Fernando Escamilla averages $2,493 across 1 cited inspection.

Fernando Escamilla: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Texas · latest 90 days of OSHA records

391employers cited

48 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Texas: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Texas

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Fernando Escamilla and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342842002 OPENED DEC 20, 2017Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Apr 7, 2023

10650 Tx-361, Corpus Christi, TX 78418 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$2,770$1,662Dec 21, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$0$0Dec 21, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$1,385$831Dec 21, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)

(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i)

(4) Holes. (i) Each employee on walking/working surfaces shall be protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes.

Other roofing contractors employers in Texas

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Texas the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.