OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Feuti Construction: OSHA inspections and violations

Providence, Rhode Island · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

2inspections
6citation items
$3,650current penalties
Sep 3, 2015last inspection

OSHA has inspected Feuti Construction 2 times in Rhode Island since 2005.

The latest one began on Sep 3, 2015 after a complaint, in North Providence.

Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 6 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $5,050 and now stand at $3,650, 28% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection training in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.503.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Feuti Construction averages $1,400 (1 cited inspection).

Feuti Construction: OSHA citation items per year, 2005 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Feuti Construction again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 340917855 OPENED SEP 3, 2015Closed

Complaint · Complete · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Mar 8, 2017

88 Stella Drive, North Providence, RI 02911 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,800$1,400Feb 26, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Serious$0$0Feb 26, 2016Final

Inspection 307574947 OPENED SEP 9, 2005Closed

Referral · Complete · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Dec 2, 2005

232 Medway Street, Providence, RI 02903 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i) · Scaffolds, general requirements
Serious$1,500$1,500Oct 17, 2005Closed
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training
Serious$0$0Oct 17, 2005Closed
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$750$750Oct 17, 2005Closed
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Serious$0$0Oct 17, 2005Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i)

(i) Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold shall be protected by a personal fall arrest system;

29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training

29 CFR 1926.454(a)

(a) The employer shall have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. The training shall include the following areas, as applicable:

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other roofing contractors employers in Rhode Island

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.