OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Hector Pineda: OSHA inspections and violations

Florissant, Missouri · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

2inspections
4citation items
$14,775current penalties
Nov 8, 2021last inspection

Hector Pineda has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Missouri, the first in 2021.

OSHA's last visit started on Nov 8, 2021 as a planned inspection, in Warrenton.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 4 citation items: 4 serious.

OSHA proposed $14,775 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.501, fall protection in construction (2 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Hector Pineda averages $7,388 over 2 cited inspections in that time.

Hector Pineda: OSHA citation items per year, 2021 to 2021
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Hector Pineda again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345625313 OPENED NOV 8, 2021Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Sep 30, 2024

1203 E Veterans Memorial Parkway, Warrenton, MO 63383 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$4,096$4,096Nov 18, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$2,487$2,487Nov 18, 2021Final

Inspection 345591796 OPENED OCT 19, 2021Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Sep 30, 2024

3021 Moonflower Ct, Florissant, MO 63031 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$4,096$4,096Nov 15, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$4,096$4,096Nov 15, 2021Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)

(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in Missouri

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.