OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Henry Guzman: OSHA inspections and violations

Upper Marlboro, Maryland · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

1inspections
5citation items
$599current penalties
Jul 22, 2016last inspection

Henry Guzman has one OSHA inspection on record in Maryland.

OSHA opened it on Jul 22, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Upper Marlboro.

From that inspection OSHA issued 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $599 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,079. Henry Guzman averages $599 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Henry Guzman: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Henry Guzman again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341641702 OPENED JUL 22, 2016Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Jun 15, 2017

15600-15610 Beech Tree Parkway, Upper Marlboro, MD 20774 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.95(a) · Criteria for personal protective equipment
Serious$187$187Sep 13, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.405(j)(1)(i) · Job-site wiring
Serious$187$187Sep 13, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$225$225Sep 13, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii) · Ground-fault protection on job sites
Other-than-serious$0$0Sep 13, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Other-than-serious$0$0Sep 13, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.404 · Ground-fault protection on job sites

29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii)

(ii) Ground-fault circuit interrupters. All 120-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20-ampere receptacle outlets on construction sites, which are not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees, shall have approved ground-fault circuit interrupters for personnel protection. Receptacles on a two-wire, single-phase portable or vehicle-mounted generator rated not more than 5kW, where the circuit conductors of the generator are insulated from the generator frame and all other grounded surfaces, need not be protected with ground-fault circuit interrupters.

29 CFR 1926.405 · Job-site wiring

29 CFR 1926.405(j)(1)(i)

(j) Equipment for general use—(1) Lighting fixtures, lampholders, lamps, and receptacles—(i) Live parts. Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles shall have no live parts normally exposed to employee contact. However, rosettes and cleat-type lampholders and receptacles located at least 8 feet (2.44 m) above the floor may have exposed parts.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

29 CFR 1926.95 · Criteria for personal protective equipment

Other framing contractors employers in Maryland

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.