Inspection 349023853 OPENED JUN 25, 2026Closed
710 W Birge St, Sherman, TX 75090 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
OSHA has inspected Henry Nunez 2 times in Texas since 2025.
The latest one began on Jun 25, 2026 to follow up on an earlier case, in Sherman.
Those inspections ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $8,512 and still stand at $8,512.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Henry Nunez averages $8,512 (1 cited inspection).
Texas · latest 90 days of OSHA records
391employers cited
48 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Texas: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Texas
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Henry Nunez and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company710 W Birge St, Sherman, TX 75090 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
710 W Birge St, Sherman, TX 75090 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,965 | $4,965 | Jul 15, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.502(d) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 15, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $3,547 | $3,547 | Jul 15, 2025 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
29 CFR 1926.502(d)
(d) Personal fall arrest systems. Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1)
(a) Training program. (1) The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Texas the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.