Friona, Texas · Other Animal Food Manufacturing · NAICS 311119
5inspections
13citation items
$2,263current penalties
Jan 20, 2023last inspection
OSHA has inspected HI-Pro Feeds 5 times in Texas since 1984.
The latest one began on Jan 20, 2023 as a planned inspection, in Friona.
Those inspections ended with 13 citation items: 2 serious and 11 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $5,634 and now stand at $2,263, 60% lower after settlements or reviews.
comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1910.20.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,872, and HI-Pro Feeds averages $575 (1 cited inspection).
HI-Pro Feeds also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
Want to know if OSHA cites HI-Pro Feeds again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2024, the Friona site logged 2 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 87 workers: 1.9 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.6 for its industry. Those cases cost 6 days away from work.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Hi Pro Feeds
Friona · 2024
87
2
1
1.9
2.6
Severe injury reports
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.
Aug 18, 2023, Friona: Hospitalization · poisoning, toxic, noxious, or allergenic effect, unspecified · body systems
An employee was observing a trainer strike the outside of a bin with a hammer to loosen feed material. The employee had an allergic reaction to the feed dust, resulting in hospitalization.
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
(h) Post-mortem data: Increased incidence and/or severity of post-mortem findings may be indicative of maternal toxicity. This can include gross or microscopic pathological findings or organ weight data, including absolute organ weight, organ-to-body weight ratio, or organ-to-brain weight ratio. When supported by findings of adverse histopathological effects in the affected organ(s), the observation of a significant change in the average weight of suspected target organ(s) of treated dams (mothers), compared to those in the control group, may be considered evidence of maternal toxicity.
29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
29 CFR 1910.132(a)
(a) Application. Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.
(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.