OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

I.A. General Contractor: OSHA inspections and violations

Washington, District of Columbia · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

1inspections
2citation items
$7,700current penalties
Sep 17, 2015last inspection

OSHA has inspected I.A. General Contractor once in District of Columbia.

The inspection began on Sep 17, 2015, in Washington.

That inspection ended with 2 citation items: 2 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $7,700 and still stand at $7,700.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and I.A. General Contractor averages $7,700 (1 cited inspection).

I.A. General Contractor: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites I.A. General Contractor again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 340927656 OPENED SEP 17, 2015Closed

Unprogrammed other · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Sep 13, 2017

1114 Montello St, Washington, DC 20035 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$4,900$4,900Nov 27, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13) · Ladders in construction
Serious$2,800$2,800Nov 27, 2015Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13)

(13) The top or top step of a stepladder shall not be used as a step.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other framing contractors employers in District of Columbia

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.