OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Innovative Ink: OSHA inspections and violations

Lakeland, Florida · Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books) · NAICS 323111

1inspections
2citation items
$720current penalties
Feb 8, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Innovative Ink once in Florida.

The inspection began on Feb 8, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Lakeland.

That inspection ended with 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $1,200 and now stand at $720, 40% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,500, and Innovative Ink averages $720 (1 cited inspection).

Innovative Ink: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Innovative Ink again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341238970 OPENED FEB 8, 2016Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 12 employees at the site · Closed Mar 22, 2016

1840 Harden Blvd., Lakeland, FL 33803 · Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$1,200$720Mar 7, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$0$0Mar 7, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)

(f) Any organic peroxide which, in laboratory testing, neither detonates in the cavitated state nor deflagrates at all and shows only a low or no effect when heated under confinement as well as low or no explosive power shall be defined as organic peroxide TYPE F;

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

Other commercial printing (except screen and books) employers in Florida

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.