OSHA has inspected Integrico Composites 3 times in Louisiana since 2015.
The latest one began on Aug 2, 2022 as a planned inspection, in Sarepta.
Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 5 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $25,580 and now stand at $19,268, 25% lower after settlements or reviews.
Air contaminants comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.1000.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Integrico Composites averages $6,423 (3 cited inspections).
It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.
Want to know if OSHA cites Integrico Composites again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company108 Inducto Way, Sarepta, LA 71071 · Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1) · Portable fire extinguishers |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 22, 2022 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i) · Using electrical equipment |
Other-than-serious | $814 | $488 | Nov 22, 2022 | Final |
108 Inducto Way, Sarepta, LA 71071 · Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $7,483 | $4,490 | Sep 23, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2) · Air contaminants |
Serious | $7,483 | $4,490 | Sep 23, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1910.1000(e) · Air contaminants |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 23, 2016 | Final |
108 Inducto Way, Sarepta, LA 71071 · Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i) · Lockout/tagout |
Serious | $4,900 | $4,900 | Jan 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $4,900 | $4,900 | Jan 7, 2016 | Final |
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.
Apr 12, 2019, Sarepta: Amputation · amputations · finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.
A maintenance tech was cleaning a piping system (piping from granulator D) and amputated his left thumb. The machine was not locked out/tagged out at the time.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2)
(2) Other substances—8-hour Time Weighted Averages. An employee's exposure to any substance in Table Z-1, the exposure limit of which is not preceded by a “C”, shall not exceed the 8-hour Time Weighted Average given for that substance in any 8-hour work shift of a 40-hour work week.
29 CFR 1910.1000(e)
(e) To achieve compliance with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, administrative or engineering controls must first be determined and implemented whenever feasible. When such controls are not feasible to achieve full compliance, protective equipment or any other protective measures shall be used to keep the exposure of employees to air contaminants within the limits prescribed in this section. Any equipment and/or technical measures used for this purpose must be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. Whenever respirators are used, their use shall comply with 1910.134.
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii)
(iii) The employer shall identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; this evaluation shall include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form. Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.