Inspection 348904947 OPENED APR 23, 2026Closed
34621 State Hwy 11, Roseau, MN 56751 · All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Intercept Industries Ltd has 6 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 1994.
OSHA's last visit started on Apr 23, 2026 as a planned inspection, in Roseau.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 14 citation items: 9 serious and 5 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $5,905 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $4,535, down 23%.
Most often, OSHA cited 5205.116, (2 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Intercept Industries Ltd averages $2,200 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
Intercept Industries Ltd also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
381employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Minnesota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Intercept Industries Ltd and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company34621 State Hwy 11, Roseau, MN 56751 · All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
34621 State Hwy 11, Roseau, MN 56751 · All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements |
Serious | $750 | $450 | Jul 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1) · Eye and face protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1c 29 CFR 1910.138(a) · Gloves and hand protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i) · Lockout/tagout |
Serious | $450 | $250 | Jul 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $2,100 | $1,400 | Jul 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 | Other-than-serious | $150 | $100 | Jul 7, 2016 | Final |
34621 State Hwy 11, Roseau, MN 56751 · All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
34621 State Hwy 11, Roseau, MN 56751 · Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Serious | $400 | $280 | Aug 12, 2010 | Closed |
Highway 11 West, Roseau, MN 56751 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Highway 11 West, Roseau, MN 56751 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1) · Noise |
Serious | $510 | $510 | Aug 11, 1994 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1)(e) · Belts, pulleys and power-transmission parts |
Serious | $450 | $450 | Aug 11, 1994 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Serious | $510 | $510 | Aug 11, 1994 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iiia) · Electrical wiring methods |
Other-than-serious | $360 | $360 | Aug 11, 1994 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Aug 11, 1994 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 3 | Other-than-serious | $225 | $225 | Aug 11, 1994 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 4 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Aug 11, 1994 | Closed |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Roseau site logged 2 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 23 workers: 12.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.7 for its industry. Those cases cost 4 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept Industries Ltd Roseau · 2025 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 12.0 | 2.7 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)
(d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection. (1) The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1)
(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1910.138(a)
(a) General requirements. Employers shall select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.