Goleta, California · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130
J M Construction Co has 8 OSHA inspections on record in California, the first in 1988.
OSHA's last visit started on Aug 31, 2022 on a referral, in Gridley.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 8 citation items: 3 serious and 5 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $2,475 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. J M Construction Co averages $528 over 2 cited inspections in that time.
1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.
California · latest 90 days of OSHA records
1,128employers cited
16 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in California
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch J M Construction Co and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company655 E Gridley Road, Gridley, CA 95948 · Other Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1629(A)(1) |
Other-than-serious | $165 | $165 | Sep 2, 2022 | Final |
E Gridley Road, Gridley, CA 95948 · Other Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
4681 Churn Creek Rd., Redding, CA 96002 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1509(C) |
Other-than-serious | $205 | $205 | Feb 9, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 3646(E) |
Other-than-serious | $685 | $685 | Feb 9, 2021 | Final |
Banfield Dr. & Catherwood Way, Sacramento, CA 95833 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Hollister & Walnut, Goleta, CA 93117 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Hollister & Walnut, Goleta, CA 93117 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Ingram & Alluvial, Pinedale, CA 93650 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
2180 Westwood Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90025 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Sep 26, 1988 (fatal): One employee killed, one injured in fall with falling truss
Employees #1 and #2 were placing roof trusses between a brick wall and a wooden beam. They were to be placed and mounted on the beam at one end and on the brick wall at the other end, across a span of over 25 ft. A plank had been installed as a spanned beam. They had installed 30 truss members and were at the beam side of the truss installation on a 4-ft-wide walkway. The walkway was composed of 4 -ft by 8-ft by 0.75-in. plywood sheeting that was approximately 32 ft long. The plywood sheeting had been installed at the top of the roof trusses and had been nailed down. The employees had not installed cross-bridging or solid blocking be tween the truss members to stiffen or strengthen the roof truss. Employees #1 an d #2 were using an opposing pedestrian traffic pattern to lace the remaining she ets of plywood in place. They would place a sheet of plywood onto the prior shee t of plywood with a 1-ft overlap, but would not tack or nail the sheets to the t russes so as to gain the best fit before nailing. As Employee #1 picked up a she et of plywood and walked to position it, Employee #2 passed close by going in th e opposite direction to pick up the next sheet of plywood for placement. This mo ved the trusses and displaced them out of the hangers. Both employees fell throu gh the roof. Employee #1 was killed. Employee #2 was hospitalized for injuries s ustained in the fall.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.28(a) · Personal protective equipment |
Serious | $640 | $640 | Nov 29, 1988 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $140 | $140 | Nov 29, 1988 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi) · Earthmovers and forklifts in construction |
Serious | $640 | $640 | Nov 29, 1988 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1904.8 · Recording criteria for needlestick and sharps injuries |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 29, 1988 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i) · Ground-fault protection on job sites |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 29, 1988 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.28(a)
(a) The employer is responsible for requiring the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions or where this part indicates the need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to the employees.
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i)
(b) Branch circuits—(1) Ground-fault protection—(i) General. The employer shall use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.