OSHA has inspected Jacam once in Texas.
The inspection began on Jan 27, 2017 as part of a related case, in Sonora.
That inspection ended with 1 citation item: 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $8,873 and now stand at $5,324, 40% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for mining and oil and gas employers since 2015 is $2,866, and Jacam averages $5,324 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Jacam again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company209 Pr 4489 M&b Well Site, Sonora, TX 76950 · Support Activities for Oil and Gas Operations · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $8,873 | $5,324 | Jul 21, 2017 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)
(h) Employee information and training. (1) Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.