Sugar Hill, Georgia · Masonry Contractors · NAICS 238140
OSHA has inspected Jaime Bucio 2 times in Georgia since 2018.
The latest one began on Sep 24, 2018 on a referral, in Sugar Hill.
Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 7 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $12,196 and now stand at $10,644, 13% lower after settlements or reviews.
Hazard communication comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1910.1200.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Jaime Bucio averages $5,322 (2 cited inspections).
Georgia · latest 90 days of OSHA records
136employers cited
6 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Georgia: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Georgia
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Jaime Bucio and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company5920 Arbor Green Circle Lot 47, Sugar Hill, GA 30518 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1) · Tools—Hand and Power: general requirements |
Serious | $3,880 | $2,328 | Nov 23, 2018 | Final |
5920 Arbor Green Cir. Lot 47, Sugar Hill, GA 30518 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $2,772 | $2,772 | Nov 23, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 23, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1c 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 23, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $2,772 | $2,772 | Nov 23, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3a 29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $2,772 | $2,772 | Nov 23, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3b 29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 23, 2018 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)
(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8)
(8) The employer shall maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and shall ensure that they are readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s). (Electronic access and other alternatives to maintaining paper copies of the safety data sheets are permitted as long as no barriers to immediate employee access in each workplace are created by such options.)
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)
(h) Employee information and training. (1) Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Georgia the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.