Since 2024, OSHA inspectors have visited Jaime Mandujano in Texas 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Feb 24, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Lubbock.
In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 4 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $4,281; today they stand at $3,451, 19% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.1153 (silica dust in construction), 3 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Jaime Mandujano averages $1,726 across 2 cited inspections.
Want to know if OSHA cites Jaime Mandujano again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company7025 8 St, Lubbock, TX 79416 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,809 | $1,809 | Mar 4, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $398 | $398 | Mar 4, 2025 | Final |
1308 Ross Street, Lubbock, TX 79405 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $2,074 | $1,244 | Jun 25, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 25, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1c 29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 25, 2024 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1)
(c) Specified exposure control methods. (1) For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i)
(2) Exposure assessment—(i) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)
(g) Written exposure control plan. (1) The employer shall establish and implement a written exposure control plan that contains at least the following elements:
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.