Traverse City, Michigan · Conveyor and Conveying Equipment Manufacturing · NAICS 333922
OSHA has inspected Jantec Inc 4 times in Michigan since 2000.
The latest one began on Jan 28, 2015, in Traverse City.
Those inspections ended with 15 citation items: 10 serious and 5 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $1,075 and now stand at $638, 41% lower after settlements or reviews.
comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 3255.1949.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Jantec Inc averages $0 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Jantec Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1777 Northern Star Dr, Traverse City, MI 49686 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i) · Hexavalent chromium |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 10, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 10, 2015 | Final |
1777 Northern Star Dr, Traverse City, MI 49686 · Conveyor and Conveying Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1777 Northern Star Dr, Traverse City, MI 49686 · Conveyor and Conveying Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 408.10727(1) |
Serious | $200 | $200 | Jan 15, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 408.10114(1) |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jan 15, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 408.12154(1) |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jan 15, 2015 | Final |
1777 Northern Star Dr, Traverse City, MI 49686 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a | Serious | $875 | $438 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1b | Serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1c | Serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1d | Serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1e | Serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1f | Serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1g | Serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1h 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1i 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | May 19, 2000 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i)
(2) Scheduled monitoring option. (i) The employer shall perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where an employer does representative sampling instead of sampling all employees in order to meet this requirement, the employer shall sample the employee(s) expected to have the highest chromium (VI) exposures.
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)
(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)
(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.