OSHA has inspected JBD Construction 3 times in California since 2006.
The latest one began on Sep 29, 2022 after a complaint, in Copperopolis.
Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 8 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $12,015 and now stand at $5,360, 55% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and JBD Construction averages $1,660 (1 cited inspection).
Inspection 125945162 OPENED MAY 2, 2007Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 50 employees at the site · Closed Mar 13, 2009
Rancho Bernardo Rd & Ralphs Rd, San Diego, CA 91977 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Mar 14, 2007: Employee trips and discharges nail gun into knee
At approximately 8:30 a.m. on March 14, 2007, Employee #1, a framer engaged in c onstruction activities in a new condo apartment complex, was on the third floor inside one of the condo units framing a window or door inside the unit. Employee #1 tripped over a metal object, possibly a metal framing brace, while he had hi s finger on the trigger of a pneumatic nail gun (Hitachi Koki, Model Number 83A2 ), causing the nail gun to discharge inadvertently. The nail gun shot a nail int o Employee #1's left knee. Employee #1 sustained a puncture wound and was hospit alized for three days.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1509 B |
Other-than-serious | $135 | $100 | Jul 12, 2007 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1513 A |
Other-than-serious | $135 | $100 | Jul 12, 2007 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1621 A |
Other-than-serious | $2,475 | $600 | Jul 12, 2007 | Final |
Inspection 125878918 OPENED SEP 26, 2006Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 50 employees at the site · Closed Mar 17, 2009
E Lake Prkwy, Chula Vista, CA 91910 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Jul 28, 2006: Employee punctures foot with nail gun
At approximately 2:30 p.m. on July 28, 2006, Employee #1, a carpenter, was worki ng on a construction site, located in Chula Vista in California. He finished the interior sheet walls using his nail gun for four hours in the morning. Employee #1 lubricated and replaced a broken piston, when he lost the spring. Employee # 1 placed the air hose up on the scaffolding without the air compressor hose atta ched. He moved outside the house and climbed up the stairs. Employee #1 stepped out on to the scaffolding and then hooked up the nail gun and air hose together, keeping them between his feet, and while bending over. When Employee #1 picked up the nail gun that was attached to the air hose, he noticed a nail sticking ou t of the right side of his shoe. The nail gun firing head was approximately 2 in . from his right foot when it went off, causing the nail to penetrate the upper part of his inside right tennis shoe. Employee #1 sustained a nail puncture inju ry to the medial part and metatarsal of his right foot. He was hospitalized in t he Scripps Mercy hospital in Chula Vista in California.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 342 A |
Other-than-serious | $5,000 | $1,000 | Feb 2, 2007 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1509 B |
Other-than-serious | $135 | $100 | Feb 2, 2007 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1704 A |
Other-than-serious | $2,475 | $1,800 | Feb 2, 2007 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.