OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

JBD Construction: OSHA inspections and violations

Chula Vista, California · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

3inspections
8citation items
$5,360current penalties
Sep 29, 2022last inspection

OSHA has inspected JBD Construction 3 times in California since 2006.

The latest one began on Sep 29, 2022 after a complaint, in Copperopolis.

Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 8 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $12,015 and now stand at $5,360, 55% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and JBD Construction averages $1,660 (1 cited inspection).

JBD Construction: OSHA citation items per year, 2006 to 2022
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites JBD Construction again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346253214 OPENED SEP 29, 2022Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Aug 7, 2023

398 Sunrise Rd., Copperopolis, CA 95228 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 341(C)(1)(A)
Other-than-serious$1,250$1,250Mar 21, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1509(C)
Other-than-serious$410$410Mar 21, 2023Final

Inspection 125945162 OPENED MAY 2, 2007Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 50 employees at the site · Closed Mar 13, 2009

Rancho Bernardo Rd & Ralphs Rd, San Diego, CA 91977 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Mar 14, 2007: Employee trips and discharges nail gun into knee

At approximately 8:30 a.m. on March 14, 2007, Employee #1, a framer engaged in c onstruction activities in a new condo apartment complex, was on the third floor inside one of the condo units framing a window or door inside the unit. Employee #1 tripped over a metal object, possibly a metal framing brace, while he had hi s finger on the trigger of a pneumatic nail gun (Hitachi Koki, Model Number 83A2 ), causing the nail gun to discharge inadvertently. The nail gun shot a nail int o Employee #1's left knee. Employee #1 sustained a puncture wound and was hospit alized for three days.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1509 B
Other-than-serious$135$100Jul 12, 2007Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1513 A
Other-than-serious$135$100Jul 12, 2007Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1621 A
Other-than-serious$2,475$600Jul 12, 2007Final

Inspection 125878918 OPENED SEP 26, 2006Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 50 employees at the site · Closed Mar 17, 2009

E Lake Prkwy, Chula Vista, CA 91910 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Jul 28, 2006: Employee punctures foot with nail gun

At approximately 2:30 p.m. on July 28, 2006, Employee #1, a carpenter, was worki ng on a construction site, located in Chula Vista in California. He finished the interior sheet walls using his nail gun for four hours in the morning. Employee #1 lubricated and replaced a broken piston, when he lost the spring. Employee # 1 placed the air hose up on the scaffolding without the air compressor hose atta ched. He moved outside the house and climbed up the stairs. Employee #1 stepped out on to the scaffolding and then hooked up the nail gun and air hose together, keeping them between his feet, and while bending over. When Employee #1 picked up the nail gun that was attached to the air hose, he noticed a nail sticking ou t of the right side of his shoe. The nail gun firing head was approximately 2 in . from his right foot when it went off, causing the nail to penetrate the upper part of his inside right tennis shoe. Employee #1 sustained a nail puncture inju ry to the medial part and metatarsal of his right foot. He was hospitalized in t he Scripps Mercy hospital in Chula Vista in California.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 342 A
Other-than-serious$5,000$1,000Feb 2, 2007Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1509 B
Other-than-serious$135$100Feb 2, 2007Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1704 A
Other-than-serious$2,475$1,800Feb 2, 2007Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

Other framing contractors employers in California

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.