OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

JJ Construction LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Lake Elmo, Minnesota · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

4inspections
11citation items
$4,425current penalties
Jul 23, 2020last inspection

OSHA has inspected JJ Construction LLC 4 times in Minnesota since 2019.

The latest one began on Jul 23, 2020 to follow up on an earlier case, in Lake Elmo.

Those inspections ended with 11 citation items: 11 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $5,875 and now stand at $4,425, 25% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 5 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and JJ Construction LLC averages $1,475 (3 cited inspections).

JJ Construction LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2019 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records

381employers cited

9 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Minnesota

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch JJ Construction LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344848627 OPENED JUL 23, 2020Closed

Follow-up · No inspection · Safety · 12 employees at the site · Closed Aug 12, 2020

192 Jade Trail N, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 344753694 OPENED MAY 12, 2020Open

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Open

192 Jade Trail N, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 182.653(08)
Serious$250$250Jul 23, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$1,375$1,375Jul 23, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Jul 23, 2020Final

Inspection 344699004 OPENED MAR 13, 2020Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 12 employees at the site · Closed Dec 31, 2020

192 Jade Trail N, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 182.653(08)
Serious$250$250Mar 24, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$375$375Mar 24, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Mar 24, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Serious$375$375Mar 24, 2020Final

Inspection 343795936 OPENED FEB 19, 2019Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Oct 20, 2020

2333 Jackson St Ne, Minneapolis, MN 55418 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 182.653(08)
Serious$250$140Jun 25, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$625$350Jun 25, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Serious$625$350Jun 25, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1926.1408(a)(2) · Power line safety (up to 350 kV)—equipment operations
Serious$1,750$960Jun 25, 2019Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1408 · Power line safety (up to 350 kV)—equipment operations

29 CFR 1926.1408(a)(2)

(2) Determine if any part of the equipment, load line or load (including rigging and lifting accessories), if operated up to the equipment's maximum working radius in the work zone, could get closer than 20 feet to a power line. If so, the employer must meet the requirements in Option (1), Option (2), or Option (3) of this section, as follows:

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1)

(b)(1) Unprotected sides and edges. Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other framing contractors employers in Minnesota

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.