OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Jorge Marquez: OSHA inspections and violations

Suwanee, Georgia · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

2inspections
6citation items
$14,592current penalties
May 18, 2015last inspection

OSHA has inspected Jorge Marquez 2 times in Georgia since 2011.

The latest one began on May 18, 2015 as a planned inspection, in Suwanee.

Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 5 serious and 1 repeat.

Penalties were first proposed at $19,520 and now stand at $14,592, 25% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Jorge Marquez averages $7,392 (1 cited inspection).

Jorge Marquez: OSHA citation items per year, 2011 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Jorge Marquez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 340635531 OPENED MAY 18, 2015Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 8 employees at the site · Closed Oct 10, 2019

4261 Tocoma Trace, Suwanee, GA 30024 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Serious$3,080$1,848Jun 15, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$3,080$1,848Jun 15, 2015Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Repeat$6,160$3,696Jun 15, 2015Final

Inspection 315738336 OPENED AUG 30, 2011Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Jan 1, 2016

1605 Great Heron Court, Suwanee, GA 30024 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$3,000$3,000Sep 30, 2011Closed
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$0$0Sep 30, 2011Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,200$4,200Sep 30, 2011Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16)

(16) Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, shall either be immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or be tagged with “Do Not Use” or similar language, and shall be withdrawn from service until repaired.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other framing contractors employers in Georgia

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.