OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Julio Rodriguez: OSHA inspections and violations

Jessup, Maryland · Masonry Contractors · NAICS 238140

1inspections
3citation items
$1,187current penalties
Jan 31, 2017last inspection

OSHA has inspected Julio Rodriguez once in Maryland.

The inspection began on Jan 31, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Jessup; the case is still open.

That inspection ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $1,187 and still stand at $1,187.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Julio Rodriguez averages $1,187 (1 cited inspection).

Julio Rodriguez: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Maryland · latest 90 days of OSHA records

195employers cited

3 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Maryland: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Maryland

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Julio Rodriguez and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342068277 OPENED JAN 31, 2017Open

Planned · Complete · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Open

7513 Garcia Place, Jessup, MD 20794 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(3) · Tools—Hand and Power: general requirements
 Serious$375$375Mar 7, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$437$437Mar 7, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$375$375Mar 7, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.300 · Tools—Hand and Power: general requirements

29 CFR 1926.300(b)(3)

(3) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii)

(vii) For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee shall be protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.

Other masonry contractors employers in Maryland

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Maryland the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.