OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Justus Construction: OSHA inspections and violations

Indpls, Indiana · Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings · NAICS 531110

2inspections
7citation items
$9,000current penalties
Jun 15, 2018last inspection

OSHA has inspected Justus Construction 2 times in Indiana since 1984.

The latest one began on Jun 15, 2018 on a referral, in Indianapolis.

Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 5 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $18,000 and now stand at $9,000, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection training in construction comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1926.503.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for real estate and rental employers since 2015 is $1,875, and Justus Construction averages $9,000 (1 cited inspection).

Justus Construction: OSHA citation items per year, 1984 to 2018
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Justus Construction again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343231023 OPENED JUN 15, 2018Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 9 employees at the site · Closed Oct 15, 2018

230 Welcome Way Blvd W. Dr, Indianapolis, IN 46214 · Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training
 Serious$4,500$2,250Sep 26, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$4,500$2,250Sep 26, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$4,500$2,250Sep 26, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$0$0Sep 26, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$4,500$2,250Sep 26, 2018Final

Inspection 14724678 OPENED JUN 21, 1984Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Aug 13, 1984

Health Center 8549 S Madison Ave, Indpls, IN 46227 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction
 Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 2, 1984Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i) · Fire protection
 Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 2, 1984Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.100 · Hard hats in construction

29 CFR 1926.100(a)

(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.

29 CFR 1926.150 · Fire protection

29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i)

(c) Portable firefighting equipment—(1) Fire extinguishers and small hose lines. (i) A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, shall be provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction thereof. Travel distance from any point of the protected area to the nearest fire extinguisher shall not exceed 100 feet.

29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training

29 CFR 1926.454(a)

(a) The employer shall have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. The training shall include the following areas, as applicable:

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other lessors of residential buildings and dwellings employers in Indiana

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.