Lincoln, North Dakota · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
OSHA has inspected King Roofing Construction 4 times in North Dakota since 2019.
The latest one began on Sep 2, 2022 as a planned inspection, in Bismarck; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 5 citation items: 2 serious and 3 repeat.
Penalties were first proposed at $29,348 and still stand at $29,348.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and King Roofing Construction averages $7,337 (4 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites King Roofing Construction again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company4501 Coleman Street, Bismarck, ND 58503 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $6,216 | $6,216 | Sep 26, 2022 | Final |
607 Lansing Lane, Bismarck, ND 58504 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $8,096 | $8,096 | May 27, 2020 | Final |
136 Libby Road, Lincoln, ND 58504 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,892 | $2,892 | May 20, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $8,096 | $8,096 | May 20, 2020 | Final |
6415 Mccurry Way, Lincoln, ND 58504 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,048 | $4,048 | Jan 24, 2020 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)
(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.