OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Leonel Espino: OSHA inspections and violations

Saint Charles, Missouri · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

3inspections
6citation items
$34,229current penalties
Sep 4, 2019last inspection

OSHA has inspected Leonel Espino 3 times in Missouri since 2016.

The latest one began on Sep 4, 2019, in Dardenne Prairie.

Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 3 serious and 3 repeat.

Penalties were first proposed at $34,229 and still stand at $34,229.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Leonel Espino averages $11,410 (3 cited inspections).

Leonel Espino: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2019
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Leonel Espino again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344281340 OPENED SEP 4, 2019Closed

Unprogrammed other · Partial · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Oct 3, 2022

33 Heavenly Valley Drive, Dardenne Prairie, MO 63366 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Repeat$8,335$8,335Oct 28, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Repeat$11,669$11,669Oct 28, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Repeat$7,578$7,578Oct 28, 2019Final

Inspection 343761722 OPENED FEB 5, 2019Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Nov 21, 2022

8200 Glen Echo Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63121 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$2,415$2,415Mar 12, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$2,415$2,415Mar 12, 2019Final

Inspection 341813210 OPENED OCT 4, 2016Closed

Unprogrammed other · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Jan 22, 2020

16 Shaw Court, Saint Charles, MO 63304 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Serious$1,817$1,817Dec 20, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in Missouri

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.