OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Leopoldo Tinoco: OSHA inspections and violations

Fairview, Texas · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

2inspections
5citation items
$10,101current penalties
Mar 4, 2024last inspection

Since 2010, OSHA inspectors have visited Leopoldo Tinoco in Texas 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Mar 4, 2024 as a planned inspection, in Crowley.

In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 4 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

The penalties, $10,101 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Leopoldo Tinoco averages $7,301 across 1 cited inspection.

Leopoldo Tinoco: OSHA citation items per year, 2010 to 2024
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Leopoldo Tinoco again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347319717 OPENED MAR 4, 2024Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Nov 6, 2026

10124 Kelly Acres, Crowley, TX 76036 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$4,839$4,839Mar 4, 2024Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$2,074$2,074Mar 4, 2024Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Other-than-serious$388$388Mar 4, 2024Final

Inspection 314177049 OPENED JUN 24, 2010Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Sep 30, 2011

425 Sloan Creek Pkwy., Fairview, TX 75069 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,000$2,000Jul 26, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$800$800Jul 26, 2010Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)

(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other roofing contractors employers in Texas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.