Luis Codero Ortega has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Ohio, the first in 2016.
OSHA's last visit started on Sep 20, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Hilliard.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 repeat.
OSHA proposed $10,582 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $5,292, down 50%.
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Luis Codero Ortega averages $5,292 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
Ohio · latest 90 days of OSHA records
275employers cited
22 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Ohio: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Ohio
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Luis Codero Ortega and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company4890 Cabo Court, Hilliard, OH 43026 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $3,527 | $1,764 | Sep 30, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $7,055 | $3,528 | Sep 30, 2016 | Final |
3959 Knapford Building 25, Columbus, OH 43230 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3)
(3) Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Ohio the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.