Since 2017, OSHA inspectors have visited Luis Sanchez in Maryland 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Nov 30, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Ridgely and is still open.
In all, OSHA issued 8 citation items: 7 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The penalties, $2,311 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Luis Sanchez averages $1,156 across 2 cited inspections.
Maryland · latest 90 days of OSHA records
197employers cited
39 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Maryland: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Maryland
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Luis Sanchez and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company11295 Maplewood Dr, Ridgely, MD 21660 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $250 | $250 | Jan 31, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $437 | $437 | Jan 31, 2019 | Final |
23 Cashell Court, Baltimore, MD 21234 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $312 | $312 | Apr 25, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $875 | $875 | Apr 25, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.502(d) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 25, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2c 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 25, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $437 | $437 | Apr 25, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16) · Ladders in construction |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 25, 2017 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Maryland the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.