M3 Distribution, Inc. has one OSHA inspection on record in Texas.
OSHA opened it on Jul 10, 2023 on a referral, in Tomball.
From that inspection OSHA issued 1 citation item: 1 serious.
OSHA proposed $7,813 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $3,125, down 60%.
For context, across all wholesale employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,425. M3 Distribution, Inc. averages $3,125 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
M3 Distribution, Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.
Want to know if OSHA cites M3 Distribution, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company25116 Stanolind Road, Tomball, TX 77375 · Electrical Apparatus and Equipment, Wiring Supplies, and Related Equipment Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $7,813 | $3,125 | Sep 29, 2023 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Tomball site logged 0 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 25 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 0.0 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M3 Distribution Inc Tomball · 2025 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| M3 Distribution, Inc. Tomball · 2024 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.
Jul 7, 2023, Tomball: Amputation · amputations · fingertip(s)
An employee was using a heat-shrink cutter to cut heat-shrink tubing and amputated her right middle fingertip.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)
(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.