OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Maalt, LP: OSHA inspections and violations

Pecos, Texas · Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services · NAICS 541614

2inspections
1citation items
$8,000current penalties
Jun 22, 2017last inspection

Maalt, LP has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Texas, the first in 2016.

OSHA's last visit started on Jun 22, 2017 to follow up on an earlier case, in Pecos.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 1 citation item: 1 serious.

OSHA proposed $11,408 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $8,000, down 30%.

For context, across all professional services employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $1,821. Maalt, LP averages $8,000 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.

Maalt, LP: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Maalt, LP again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342420932 OPENED JUN 22, 2017Closed

Follow-up · Partial · Safety · 162 employees at the site · Closed Jun 29, 2017

2903 Hwy 17, Pecos, TX 79772 · Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 341875854 OPENED OCT 28, 2016Closed

Fatality or catastrophe · Complete · Safety · 162 employees at the site · Closed Jun 29, 2017

2903 Hwy 17, Pecos, TX 79772 · Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Oct 28, 2016 (fatal): Employee crushed and killed by machinery

At 4:00 a.m. on October 28, 2016, an employee was operating a transloader used to dispense material from a railroad car. In an attempt to adjust the volume of material being dispensed, the employee stepped onto the running conveyer belt and was drawn into the head of the transloader. He was crushed and killed. The incident investigation revealed that the safety bar sensor had been bypassed, allowing the conveyor and transloader to still run despite the employee climbing onto the machine.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$11,408$8,000Mar 31, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

Other process, physical distribution, and logistics consulting services employers in Texas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.