OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Maple Mountain Construction: OSHA inspections and violations

Saratoga Springs, Utah · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · NAICS 236115

2inspections
7citation items
$5,000current penalties
Jun 6, 2018last inspection

Maple Mountain Construction has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Utah, the first in 2016.

OSHA's last visit started on Jun 6, 2018 on a referral, in Pleasant Grove.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 7 citation items: 7 serious.

OSHA proposed $5,000 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.651, excavations (2 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Maple Mountain Construction averages $2,500 over 2 cited inspections in that time.

Maple Mountain Construction: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2018
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Utah · latest 90 days of OSHA records

68employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Utah: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Utah

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Maple Mountain Construction and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343208963 OPENED JUN 6, 2018Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Aug 24, 2018

Vicinity Of 1800n And 240 E, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2) · Excavations
 Serious$2,000$2,000Jul 6, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2) · Excavations
 Serious$0$0Jul 6, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1) · Trench protection
 Serious$0$0Jul 6, 2018Final

Inspection 341618148 OPENED JUL 13, 2016Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 11 employees at the site · Closed Dec 5, 2016

Lot 176 Iron Horse And Peachtree Lane, Saratoga Springs, UT 84045 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1) · Electrical equipment on job sites
 Serious$1,500$1,500Jul 28, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2) · Electrical equipment on job sites
 Serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1) · Electrical safety in construction
 Serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$1,500$1,500Jul 28, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.403 · Electrical equipment on job sites

29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)

(b) Examination, installation, and use of equipment—(1) Examination. The employer shall ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. Safety of equipment shall be determined on the basis of the following considerations:

29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2)

(2) Installation and use. Listed, labeled, or certified equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification.

29 CFR 1926.416 · Electrical safety in construction

29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1)

(e) Cords and cables. (1) Worn or frayed electric cords or cables shall not be used.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.651 · Excavations

29 CFR 1926.652 · Trench protection

Other new single-family housing construction (except for-sale builders) employers in Utah

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Utah the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.