OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Mario Miranda: OSHA inspections and violations

Washington, District of Columbia · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
3citation items
$3,200current penalties
May 26, 2016last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited Mario Miranda in District of Columbia one time.

It opened on May 26, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Washington.

In all, OSHA issued 3 citation items: 3 serious.

The proposed penalties came to $5,600; today they stand at $3,200, 43% less.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Mario Miranda averages $3,200 across 1 cited inspection.

Mario Miranda: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Mario Miranda again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341574515 OPENED MAY 26, 2016Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Nov 6, 2017

1613 Longfellow Street Nw, Washington, DC 20013 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$2,800$1,800Jul 25, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(5) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$0$0Jul 25, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$2,800$1,400Jul 25, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21)

(21) Each employee shall use at least one hand to grasp the ladder when progressing up and/or down the ladder.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(5)

(5) Snaphooks shall be sized to be compatible with the member to which they are connected to prevent unintentional disengagement of the snaphook by depression of the snaphook keeper by the connected member, or shall be a locking type snaphook designed and used to prevent disengagement of the snaphook by the contact of the snaphook keeper by the connected member. Effective January 1, 1998, only locking type snaphooks shall be used.

Other roofing contractors employers in District of Columbia

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.