Since 2009, OSHA inspectors have visited Martinez Roofing in Texas 5 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Apr 21, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Lubbock and is still open.
In all, OSHA issued 8 citation items: 6 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $8,620; today they stand at $7,112, 17% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 4 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Martinez Roofing averages $1,131 across 2 cited inspections.
Want to know if OSHA cites Martinez Roofing again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1301 Buddy Holly Ave, Lubbock, TX 79401 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,170 | $1,302 | Jun 9, 2025 | Final |
3905 South Expressway 83, Harlingen, TX 78550 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,600 | $960 | Sep 30, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 30, 2015 | Final |
10830 N. Central Expressway, Dallas, TX 75231 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $1,600 | $1,600 | Sep 14, 2012 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $2,800 | Sep 14, 2012 | Final |
1725 Boca Chica, Brownsville, TX 78520 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
5310 Duval Rd, Austin, TX 78727 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $450 | $450 | Aug 19, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Aug 19, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Aug 19, 2009 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.