OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Mastercraft Remodeling, LLC.: OSHA inspections and violations

Washington, District of Columbia · Residential Remodelers · NAICS 236118

1inspections
5citation items
$9,324current penalties
Dec 6, 2021last inspection

OSHA has inspected Mastercraft Remodeling, LLC. once in District of Columbia.

The inspection began on Dec 6, 2021 as a planned inspection, in Washington.

That inspection ended with 5 citation items: 5 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $9,324 and still stand at $9,324.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Mastercraft Remodeling, LLC. averages $9,324 (1 cited inspection).

Mastercraft Remodeling, LLC.: OSHA citation items per year, 2021 to 2021
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

District of Columbia · latest 90 days of OSHA records

14employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in District of Columbia: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in District of Columbia

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Mastercraft Remodeling, LLC. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345670855 OPENED DEC 6, 2021Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Sep 22, 2025

817 18th Street, Ne, Washington, DC 20002 · Residential Remodelers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$3,108$3,108May 25, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training
 Serious$0$0May 25, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,351$4,351May 25, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$1,865$1,865May 25, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1) · Ladder and stairway training
 Serious$0$0May 25, 2022Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.1060 · Ladder and stairway training

29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)

(1) The employer shall ensure that each employee has been trained by a competent person in the following areas, as applicable:

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)

(g) Fall protection. (1) Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1) (i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers.

29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

Other residential remodelers employers in District of Columbia

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in District of Columbia the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.