OSHA inspectors have visited Mastermolding, Inc. in Arizona one time.
It opened on Nov 23, 2015 as a planned inspection, in Phoenix.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.
The penalties, $750 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.
The rule cited most here is 1910.212 (machine guarding), 2 times.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $4,500 penalty. Mastermolding, Inc. averages $750 across 1 cited inspection.
Mastermolding, Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites Mastermolding, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company5525 W. Latham St. Suite 1, Phoenix, AZ 85043 · All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $750 | $750 | Jan 11, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jan 11, 2016 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2020, the Phoenix site logged 0 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 29 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 1.1 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mastermolding - Phoenix Facility Phoenix · 2020 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)
(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.