OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Max-Air Technology: OSHA inspections and violations

Wentzville, Missouri · Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing · NAICS 333995

2inspections
1citation items
$0current penalties
Mar 11, 2020last inspection

Since 2020, OSHA inspectors have visited Max-Air Technology in Missouri 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Mar 11, 2020 on a referral, in Wentzville.

In all, OSHA issued 1 citation item: 1 other-than-serious.

No penalty came with these citations.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Max-Air Technology averages $0 across 1 cited inspection.

Max-Air Technology also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.

Max-Air Technology: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Max-Air Technology again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344690649 OPENED MAR 11, 2020Closed

Referral · Partial · Health · 20 employees at the site · Closed Jun 3, 2020

114 Resource Dr, Wentzville, MO 63385 · Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 27, 2020Final

Inspection 344677075 OPENED MAR 5, 2020Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 25 employees at the site · Closed Aug 18, 2020

114 Resource Dr., Wentzville, MO 63385 · Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Mar 2, 2020: Employee amputates fingertip while applying air to valve tha

At 3:45 p.m. on March 2, 2020, an employee working for a rotary actuator and automated valve manufacturer was performing a task known as "assembling an 8" on an automated butterfly valve. The employee was near the end of his work shift and indicated that he was trying to finish up one last valve before the end of the shift. The employee did not set the valve/actuator assembly on the testing arms before applying air pressure. Instead, he placed the assembly on the table on its side. The employee was attempting to stabilize the assembly with his right hand. When he applied air, he caught his right ring finger in the valve as it closed. The employee amputated his fingertip and was hospitalized.

No citations from this inspection.

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2019, the Wentzville site logged 0 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 21 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 1.4 for its industry.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Max-Air Technology, Inc.
Wentzville · 2019
21 000.01.4

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.

Mar 2, 2020, Wentzville: Hospitalization, amputation · amputations · fingertip(s)

An employee suffered a partial amputation to the ring fingertip while working on a butterfly valve actuator.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)

(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.

Other fluid power cylinder and actuator manufacturing employers in Missouri

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.