OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Mayola LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Brookfield, Wisconsin · Masonry Contractors · NAICS 238140

2inspections
12citation items
$19,259current penalties
Nov 27, 2020last inspection

Mayola LLC has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Wisconsin, the first in 2020.

OSHA's last visit started on Nov 27, 2020 as a planned inspection, in Franklin.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 12 citation items: 10 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $19,259 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.134, respiratory protection (3 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Mayola LLC averages $9,630 over 2 cited inspections in that time.

Mayola LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Wisconsin · latest 90 days of OSHA records

232employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Wisconsin: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Wisconsin

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Mayola LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345089155 OPENED NOV 27, 2020Closed

Planned · Partial · Health · 3 employees at the site · Closed Dec 19, 2023

9744a South 31 Street, Franklin, WI 53132 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1) · Silica dust in construction
Serious$4,096$4,096Feb 19, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.134(c) · Respiratory protection
Serious$4,096$4,096Feb 19, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(2) · Silica dust in construction
Serious$0$0Feb 19, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2c
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection
Serious$0$0Feb 19, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2d
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1) · Respiratory protection
Serious$0$0Feb 19, 2021Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) · Proving cited hazards were fixed
Other-than-serious$329$329Apr 8, 2021Final

Inspection 344963400 OPENED OCT 7, 2020Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Dec 19, 2023

15605 Burleigh Place, Brookfield, WI 53005 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
Serious$2,313$2,313Dec 18, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
Serious$4,048$4,048Dec 18, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Dec 18, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training
Serious$4,048$4,048Dec 18, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Serious$0$0Dec 18, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) · Proving cited hazards were fixed
Other-than-serious$329$329Jan 20, 2021Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1903.19 · Proving cited hazards were fixed

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1)

(c) Abatement certification. (1) Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1)

(d) Abatement documentation. (1) The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)

(c) After completing the test exercises, the test administrator must question each test subject regarding the comfort of the respirator. When a test subject states that the respirator is unacceptable, the employer must ensure that the test administrator repeats the protocol using another respirator model.

29 CFR 1926.1153 · Silica dust in construction

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other masonry contractors employers in Wisconsin

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Wisconsin the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.