Since 2014, OSHA inspectors have visited MG Roofing in Colorado 6 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Jul 28, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Fountain.
In all, OSHA issued 7 citation items: 6 serious and 1 repeat.
The proposed penalties came to $17,242; today they stand at $14,698, 15% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 4 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. MG Roofing averages $4,099 across 3 cited inspections.
Want to know if OSHA cites MG Roofing again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1025 Bromefield Drive, Fountain, CO 80817 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $6,098 | $6,098 | Sep 21, 2018 | Final |
8164 Glory Dr., Colorado Springs, CO 80924 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,772 | $1,500 | Apr 30, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,772 | $1,500 | Apr 30, 2018 | Final |
1655 Tennyson Street, Denver, CO 80219 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1655 Tennyson Street, Denver, CO 80219 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $1,600 | $1,600 | May 18, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,600 | $1,600 | May 18, 2016 | Final |
1720 60th Ave., Greeley, CO 80634 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1720 60th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80634 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,200 | $1,200 | Jan 14, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $1,200 | $1,200 | Jan 14, 2014 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.