OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Miguel Sanchez: OSHA inspections and violations

Lorena, Texas · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

3inspections
4citation items
$4,838current penalties
Oct 28, 2026last inspection

OSHA has inspected Miguel Sanchez 3 times in Texas since 2014.

The latest one began on Oct 28, 2026 to follow up on an earlier case, in Lorena.

Those inspections ended with 4 citation items: 2 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $4,838 and still stand at $4,838.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Miguel Sanchez averages $2,838 (1 cited inspection).

Miguel Sanchez: OSHA citation items per year, 2014 to 2026
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Miguel Sanchez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 349252833 OPENED OCT 28, 2026Closed

Follow-up · Partial · Safety · 1 employee at the site · Closed Oct 30, 2026

11505 Themis Court, Lorena, TX 76655 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 348751264 OPENED FEB 13, 2026Open

Planned · Partial · Safety · 1 employee at the site · Open

11505 Themis Court, Lorena, TX 76655 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,838$2,838Mar 6, 2026Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Other-than-serious$0$0Mar 6, 2026Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1060(a) · Ladder and stairway training
Other-than-serious$0$0Mar 6, 2026Final

Inspection 339976177 OPENED OCT 1, 2014Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Aug 11, 2016

23910 Ih 10 W., San Antonio, TX 78257 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,000$2,000Oct 9, 2014Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1060 · Ladder and stairway training

29 CFR 1926.1060(a)

(a) The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1)

(a) Training program. (1) The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.

Other framing contractors employers in Texas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.