OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Millenium Engine Plating Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Hialeah, Florida · Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring · NAICS 332813

1inspections
4citation items
$0current penalties
Feb 29, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Millenium Engine Plating Inc. once in Florida.

The inspection began on Feb 29, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Hialeah.

That inspection ended with 4 citation items: 4 other-than-serious.

None of the citations carried a penalty.

Respiratory protection comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.134.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Millenium Engine Plating Inc. averages $0 (1 cited inspection).

Millenium Engine Plating Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Millenium Engine Plating Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341288850 OPENED FEB 29, 2016Closed

Planned · Partial · Health · 25 employees at the site · Closed Oct 3, 2016

600 W 84th St, Hialeah, FL 33014 · Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii) · Respiratory protection
 Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6) · Respiratory protection
 Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i) · Hexavalent chromium
 Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3 Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1026 · Hexavalent chromium

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i)

(2) Scheduled monitoring option. (i) The employer shall perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where an employer does representative sampling instead of sampling all employees in order to meet this requirement, the employer shall sample the employee(s) expected to have the highest chromium (VI) exposures.

29 CFR 1910.1027 · Cadmium

29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(1)(i)

(d) Exposure monitoring—(1) General. (i) Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section shall determine if any employee may be exposed to cadmium at or above the action level.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii)

(ii) In addition, the employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).

Other electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring employers in Florida

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.