Since 2010, OSHA inspectors have visited Mocorp Inc in Minnesota 4 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Nov 14, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Anoka.
In all, OSHA issued 10 citation items: 5 serious and 5 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $2,525; today they stand at $2,142, 15% less.
The rule cited most here is 5206.700 (), 2 times.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Mocorp Inc averages $289 across 2 cited inspections.
Want to know if OSHA cites Mocorp Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company14280 Sunfish Lake Blvd Nw, Anoka, MN 55303 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Other-than-serious | $200 | $140 | Jan 2, 2020 | Final |
14280 Sunfish Lake Blvd Nw, Anoka, MN 55303 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $225 | $158 | Dec 27, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i) · Belts, pulleys and power-transmission parts |
Serious | $300 | $210 | Dec 27, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 | Other-than-serious | $100 | $70 | Dec 27, 2016 | Final |
9944 Highway 10, Elk River, MN 55330 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $450 | $315 | Mar 6, 2014 | Closed |
9944 Highway 10, Elk River, MN 55330 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Serious | $250 | $250 | Sep 16, 2010 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 | Serious | $500 | $500 | Sep 16, 2010 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1) · Hexavalent chromium |
Other-than-serious | $250 | $250 | Sep 16, 2010 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1) · Hexavalent chromium |
Other-than-serious | $250 | $250 | Sep 16, 2010 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 3 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 16, 2010 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1)
(d) Exposure determination—(1) General. Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section shall determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). This determination shall be made in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)
(l) Communication of chromium (VI) hazards to employees—(1) Hazard communication—general—(i) Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors and employers shall comply with all requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (§ 1910.1200) for chromium (VI).
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.