OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Morrison Builders, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Affton, Missouri · Industrial Building Construction · NAICS 236210

2inspections
6citation items
$9,768current penalties
Feb 18, 2016last inspection

Since 2011, OSHA inspectors have visited Morrison Builders, Inc. in Missouri 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Feb 18, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Kirksville.

In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 6 serious.

The proposed penalties came to $11,280; today they stand at $9,768, 13% less.

The rule cited most here is 1926.1053 (ladders in construction), 3 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. Morrison Builders, Inc. averages $3,528 across 1 cited inspection.

Morrison Builders, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2011 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Morrison Builders, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341263127 OPENED FEB 18, 2016Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Sep 28, 2016

1407 S. Baltimore, Kirksville, MO 63501 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
Serious$1,440$1,008Mar 1, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,160$1,512Mar 1, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$1,440$1,008Mar 1, 2016Final

Inspection 315249441 OPENED JAN 27, 2011Closed

Referral · Complete · Safety · 21 employees at the site · Closed Oct 2, 2012

4343 Weber Rd, Affton, MO 63123 · Industrial Building Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction
Serious$2,040$2,040May 6, 2011Closed
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$4,200$4,200May 6, 2011Closed
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4) · Ladders in construction
Serious$0$0May 6, 2011Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.100 · Hard hats in construction

29 CFR 1926.100(a)

(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

Other industrial building construction employers in Missouri

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.