Inspection 348364779 OPENED JUL 10, 2025Closed
4821 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 · Packaging Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
White Bear Lake, Minnesota · Packaging Machinery Manufacturing · NAICS 333993
Since 2004, OSHA inspectors have visited Multifeeder Technology Inc in Minnesota 6 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Jul 10, 2025 as a planned inspection, in White Bear Lake.
In all, OSHA issued 9 citation items: 6 serious and 3 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $2,900; today they stand at $2,140, 26% less.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Multifeeder Technology Inc averages $585 across 2 cited inspections.
Want to know if OSHA cites Multifeeder Technology Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company4821 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 · Packaging Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
4821 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 · Packaging Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i) · Belts, pulleys and power-transmission parts |
Serious | $300 | $210 | Jun 16, 2021 | Final |
4821 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 · Packaging Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements |
Serious | $500 | $300 | Nov 28, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1) · Eye and face protection |
Serious | $500 | $300 | Nov 28, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.138(a) · Gloves and hand protection |
Serious | $300 | $180 | Nov 28, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $300 | $180 | Nov 28, 2017 | Final |
4821 White Bear Parkway, St. Paul, MN 55110 · Packaging Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $100 | $70 | Jan 18, 2012 | Closed |
4821 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 · Packaging Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Serious | $450 | $450 | Jun 7, 2010 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3) · Exit routes |
Other-than-serious | $300 | $300 | Jun 7, 2010 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv) · Electrical wiring methods |
Other-than-serious | $150 | $150 | Jun 7, 2010 | Closed |
4821 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 · All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)
(d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection. (1) The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1)
(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)
(2) A record of the test shall be kept on file, assuming the fit test was successful. The record must contain the test subject's name; overall fit factor; make, model, style and size of respirator used; and date tested.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.