Salt Lake City, Utah · Plastics Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing · NAICS 326122
OSHA has inspected Nammo Composite Solutions 4 times in Utah since 2012.
The latest one began on Jul 8, 2026 after a complaint, in Salt Lake City.
Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 5 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $7,250 and now stand at $3,625, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.
Machine guarding comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1910.212.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,500, and Nammo Composite Solutions averages $875 (1 cited inspection).
Nammo Composite Solutions also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Utah · latest 90 days of OSHA records
68employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Utah: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Utah
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Nammo Composite Solutions and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company1020 500 W, Salt Lake City, Ut 84101, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 · Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1020 S 500 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 · Plastics Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $1,750 | $875 | Aug 11, 2017 | Final |
1000 S 500 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84114 · All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1000 S 500 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84114 · Plastics Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii) · Lockout/tagout |
Serious | $2,500 | $1,250 | Jul 9, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $2,500 | $1,250 | Jul 9, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1910.212(b) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 9, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2c 29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4) · Grinders and abrasive wheels |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 9, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $500 | $250 | Jul 9, 2012 | Closed |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Salt Lake City site logged 5 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 92 workers: 5.9 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.4 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAMMO Composite Solutions LLC Salt Lake City · 2025 | 92 | 5 | 0 | 5.9 | 2.4 |
| Nammo Composite Solutions Salt Lake City · 2018 | 157 | 5 | 1 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)
(f) Any organic peroxide which, in laboratory testing, neither detonates in the cavitated state nor deflagrates at all and shows only a low or no effect when heated under confinement as well as low or no explosive power shall be defined as organic peroxide TYPE F;
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)
(ii) Lockout devices and tagout devices shall be singularly identified; shall be the only devices(s) used for controlling energy; shall not be used for other purposes; and shall meet the following requirements:
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Utah the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.