OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Naval Facilites Engineering Command Washington: OSHA inspections and violations

Bolling Afb, District of Columbia · National Security · NAICS 928110

1inspections
2citation items
$0current penalties
Mar 20, 2017last inspection

Naval Facilites Engineering Command Washington has one OSHA inspection on record in District of Columbia.

OSHA opened it on Mar 20, 2017 on a referral, in Bolling Afb.

From that inspection OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.

OSHA did not attach a penalty to any of these citations.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.335, safeguards for personnel protection (2 items).

For context, across all public administration employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $0. Naval Facilites Engineering Command Washington averages $0 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Naval Facilites Engineering Command Washington: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Naval Facilites Engineering Command Washington again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342200516 OPENED MAR 20, 2017Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · Federal government · 5,000 employees at the site · Closed Sep 13, 2017

Building 371, Bolling Afb, DC 20032 · National Security · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Mar 9, 2017: Employee adjusting limit switch incurs electric shock and bu

At 12:30 p.m. on March 9, 2017, Employee #1, employed at a Naval facility, was engaged in maintenance/repair work. He was standing on a ladder and using a screwdriver to adjust a limit switch on a motor that controlled an overhead garage door. The screwdriver came into contact with live electrical parts, and Employee #1 received an electric shock. Emergency services were called, and Employee #1 was transported to the hospital. He was admitted and treated for electrical burns to his right hand and fingers. The subsequent investigation determined the employee was exposed to 480 volts of electricity delivered by three phases and at 1.8 amps.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i) · Safeguards for personnel protection
 Serious$0$0Jul 19, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(i) · Safeguards for personnel protection
 Serious$0$0Jul 19, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.335 · Safeguards for personnel protection

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i)

(a) Use of protective equipment—(1) Personal protective equipment. (i) Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards shall be provided with, and shall use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed.

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(i)

(2) General protective equipment and tools. (i) When working near exposed energized conductors or circuit parts, each employee shall use insulated tools or handling equipment if the tools or handling equipment might make contact with such conductors or parts. If the insulating capability of insulated tools or handling equipment is subject to damage, the insulating material shall be protected.

Other national security employers in District of Columbia

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.