Since 2009, OSHA inspectors have visited Neometrics Inc in Minnesota 3 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Jan 7, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Plymouth.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.
The proposed penalties came to $1,300; today they stand at $1,060, 18% less.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Neometrics Inc averages $500 across 1 cited inspection.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
381employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Minnesota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Neometrics Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company2605 Fernbrook Lane N Suite J, Plymouth, MN 55447 · Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $500 | $500 | Jan 26, 2016 | Final |
2605 Fernbrook Lane N, Plymouth, MN 55447 · Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1) · Hexavalent chromium |
Serious | $800 | $560 | May 4, 2012 | Closed |
2605 Fernbrook Lane N, Suite J, Plymouth, MN 55447 · Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1)
(d) Exposure determination—(1) General. Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section shall determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). This determination shall be made in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)
(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.