OSHA has inspected Niagara Bottling, LLC 17 times in California since 2002.
The latest one began on Jan 8, 2026 after a complaint, in Stockton; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 42 citation items: 5 serious and 37 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $124,610 and now stand at $68,310, 45% lower after settlements or reviews.
comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 2340.16.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,873, and Niagara Bottling, LLC averages $15,468 (3 cited inspections).
Niagara Bottling, LLC also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
California · latest 90 days of OSHA records
1,128employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
Incident on Jun 4, 2020: Employee injures head and spine when struck by falling objec
At 1:00 a.m. on June 4, 2020, an employee was holding a portable ladder, and a coworker was working on the depalletizer's control arm while standing on the ladder. As the coworker was working on the panel, he pushed the solenoid for air. When air pressure got released, the palletizer head gripper fell on the employee. The employee was pinned between the conveyor and the depalletizer head gripper. Proper lockout/tagout procedures were not implemented. The employee sustained head and spine injuries. The employee was taken to Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, where he was hospitalized for five days and then transferred to Kaiser Permanente Hospital in Fontana, where he was hospitalized for seven days. Surgery was performed on his spine.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3314(G)(2)(A)
Other-than-serious
$750
$750
Dec 2, 2020
Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3203(A)
Serious
$13,500
$13,500
Dec 2, 2020
Final
Citation 3, item 1
29 CFR 3314(L)
Serious
$13,500
$13,500
Dec 2, 2020
Final
Citation 4, item 1
29 CFR 3314(C)
Serious
$18,000
$18,000
Dec 2, 2020
Final
Inspection 340614486 OPENED MAY 6, 2015Closed
Complaint · Partial · Health · 100 employees at the site · Closed Jul 24, 2015
Incident on Jun 15, 2010: Employee's finger is amputated in chain sprocket
At approximately 11:00 a.m. on June 15, 2010, Employee #1, of Niagara Bottling L LC, was cleaning a running chain sprocket drive. Employee #1 removed the plexi g lass cover over the chain sprocket drive, and some paper towel got caught. His h and was pulled into the chain sprocket. Employee #1 was transported to the hospi tal for treatment of an amputation to his left thumb above the first knuckle and severed nerves on both sides of his left index finger.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3314 C
Other-than-serious
$750
$750
Dec 6, 2010
Closed
Inspection 312311210 OPENED JAN 26, 2009Closed
Planned · Partial · Safety · 120 employees at the site · Closed Mar 27, 2010
Incident on Mar 12, 2008: Employee's arm is injured while reaching into machine
On March 12, 2008, Employee #1 was working for a company that manufactured, fill ed, packaged, and transported plastic water bottles. He was monitoring a Rotatin g Unscrambler machine (manufactured by Lanfranchi, Model Number L3-SR-21/18/36, Serial Number 1670-533-99). This machine would place empty bottles into an uprig ht position before entering a filling machine. When the unscrambler machine woul d become jammed, it would be operated in the "jog" mode - where the machine woul d slowly rotate to locate and remove the jammed bottle. However, the control pan el for the jog mode was faulty. The panel was rigged with bare wires that an emp loyee would manually connect in order to begin the jog mode. To end the jog mode , an employee would separate the wires that were in his hands. The power source to this panel would remain energized during this process. Employee #1 followed t his process to activate the jog mode to locate a jammed bottle. While reaching i nto the machine for the jammed bottle with his right arm, he inadvertently conne cted the two wires, which were both in his left hand. Employee #1's right forear m was caught in the machine. After being extricated, Employee #1 was hospitalize d for an avulsion of his right forearm.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 3314 G02 A
Other-than-serious
$185
$185
Aug 22, 2008
Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 3314 J01
Other-than-serious
$185
$185
Aug 22, 2008
Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3328 C
Other-than-serious
$3,375
$0
Aug 22, 2008
Final
Citation 3, item 1
29 CFR 3314 C
Other-than-serious
$18,000
$7,000
Aug 22, 2008
Final
Inspection 310600374 OPENED SEP 6, 2007Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 171 employees at the site · Closed Sep 19, 2015
Incident on Dec 5, 2005: Employee is injured while replacing hose on equipment
On December 5, 2005, Employee #1 was replacing a hot air hose for a plastic pell et dryer, manufactured by AEC Whitlock; Model Number WD225. This equipment was i nstalled on a metal frame approximately 11 ft above the floor. The dryer was a c ylindrical vessel, approximately 4 ft in diameter and 4 ft high. Employee #1 use d a ladder to access the defective hose. To balance himself, he grabbed onto the top part of the cylindrical dryer with his right hand. He was injured, when his fingers were caught in the moving parts of the material regulator valve, which is located between the hopper and the dryer vessel. The moving parts of the regu lator are usually enclosed with a metal guard, however, the guard had been remov ed during a prior shift. Employee #1was hospitalized for the amputation of part of his right middle finger, and fractures to his right index and ring fingers.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 3314 G
Other-than-serious
$425
$425
Jun 1, 2006
Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 3314 J02
Other-than-serious
$425
$425
Jun 1, 2006
Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 3314 D
Other-than-serious
$850
$720
Jun 1, 2006
Final
Inspection 126100460 OPENED SEP 2, 2003Closed
Referral · Partial · Health · 15 employees at the site · Closed Jan 6, 2005
Incident on Aug 10, 2003: Molding machine amputates employee's finger
On August 10, 2003, Employee #1 was adjusting a Nissei ASB PF8-4B blow mold mach ine which was not working properly. Employee #1 could not ascertain what was wro ng unless the machine was operating. Employee #1 overrode the safety interlock o n the door which allowed access to the moving parts, and as he was preparing to make repairs, his right thumb was crushed by a moving part of the machine. Emplo yee #1 suffered an amputation but was not hospitalized.
Incident on Jul 1, 2002: Employee's finger is amputated in machinery
At approximately 3:00 a.m. on July 1, 2002, Employee #1, a contract employee of Niagara Bottling, was operating an Okme Tray Packer in which plastic containers of bottled water are mechanically placed in cardboard trays. According to an emp loyer representative, Employee #1 had slid a plexiglass shield aside to free a j ammed a tray. His right little finger became entangled in a chain and sprocket a t the in-feed portion of the conveyor line. Employee #1 was hospitalized for a p artial amputation of the finger. Employee #1, who operated this machine for appr oximately three months, did not respond to requests to be interviewed about this accident.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3314 A
Other-than-serious
$205
$100
Dec 3, 2002
Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3942 A
Other-than-serious
$2,475
$200
Dec 3, 2002
Closed
Inspection 300858313 OPENED JUN 7, 2002Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 48 employees at the site · Closed Dec 3, 2002
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Rialto site logged 4 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 318 workers: 1.2 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 3.8 for its industry. Those cases cost 41 days away from work.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Rialto
Rialto · 2025
318
4
2
1.2
3.8
Niagara Bottling LLC - Stockton 4
Stockton · 2025
240
4
0
1.6
3.8
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Philly St
Ontario · 2025
179
1
1
0.5
3.8
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Concours St.
Ontario · 2025
103
0
0
0.0
3.8
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton
Stockton · 2025
75
0
0
0.0
3.8
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton 2
Stockton · 2025
66
1
0
1.5
3.8
Niagara Bottling LLC - Stockton 3
Stockton · 2025
61
0
0
0.0
3.8
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate
Ontario · 2018
966
2
0
0.2
3.8
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.