NTM Inc has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 2015.
OSHA's last visit started on Apr 16, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Minneapolis.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 5 citation items: 4 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $1,500 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $1,050, down 30%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.213, woodworking machinery (2 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. NTM Inc averages $525 over 2 cited inspections in that time.
NTM Inc also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites NTM Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company140 Ne Liberty St, Minneapolis, MN 55432 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $300 | $210 | Apr 24, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4) · Woodworking machinery |
Serious | $300 | $210 | Apr 24, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 | Other-than-serious | $100 | $70 | Apr 24, 2019 | Final |
140 Ne Liberty St, Fridley, MN 55432 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $500 | $350 | Sep 1, 2015 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4) · Woodworking machinery |
Serious | $300 | $210 | Sep 1, 2015 | Closed |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Fridley site logged 2 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 20 workers: 9.6 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.7 for its industry. Those cases cost 2 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTM Inc. Fridley · 2025 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 9.6 | 2.7 |
| NTM, Inc Fridley · 2019 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 3.1 | 2.7 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4)
(4) Installation shall be in such a manner that the front end of the unit will be slightly higher than the rear, so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.