OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

O'Neill Development Corporation: OSHA inspections and violations

Washington, District of Columbia · Residential Remodelers · NAICS 236118

4inspections
14citation items
$9,093current penalties
Feb 8, 2022last inspection

OSHA has inspected O'Neill Development Corporation 4 times in District of Columbia since 2001.

The latest one began on Feb 8, 2022, in Washington.

Those inspections ended with 14 citation items: 8 serious, 1 repeat and 5 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $15,711 and now stand at $9,093, 42% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and O'Neill Development Corporation averages $4,068 (1 cited inspection).

O'Neill Development Corporation: OSHA citation items per year, 2001 to 2022
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

District of Columbia · latest 90 days of OSHA records

14employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in District of Columbia: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in District of Columbia

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch O'Neill Development Corporation and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345773634 OPENED FEB 8, 2022Closed

Programmed other · Complete · Safety · 1 employee at the site · Closed Jun 21, 2022

3224 Rittenhouse Street, Nw, Washington, DC 20015 · Residential Remodelers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i) · Ground-fault protection on job sites
 Serious$1,585$1,110Jun 6, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$2,113$1,479Jun 6, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.701(b) · Concrete and Masonry Construction: general requirements
 Serious$2,113$1,479Jun 6, 2022Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.153(j) · Liquefied petroleum gas (LP-Gas)
 Other-than-serious$0$0Jun 6, 2022Final

Inspection 316302769 OPENED MAR 6, 2012Closed

Unprogrammed other · Complete · Safety · 13 employees at the site · Closed Aug 23, 2012

5415 Potomac Ave Nw, Washington, DC 20016 · Residential Remodelers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Repeat$6,000$3,000Jun 15, 2012Closed

Inspection 315913780 OPENED NOV 1, 2011Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 9 employees at the site · Closed Nov 30, 2011

5000 Millwood Lane, Washington, DC 20016 · Residential Remodelers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$3,000$1,500Nov 15, 2011Closed
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$0$0Nov 15, 2011Closed

Inspection 303854988 OPENED APR 3, 2001Closed

Referral · Complete · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed May 9, 2001

4495 Glen Brook Road, Nw, Washington, DC 20016 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.304(f) · Woodworking tools
 Serious$375$275Apr 10, 2001Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.304(i)(1) · Woodworking tools
 Serious$225$100Apr 10, 2001Closed
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$300$150Apr 10, 2001Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 10, 2001Closed
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii) · Ground-fault protection on job sites
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 10, 2001Closed
Citation 2, item 3
29 CFR 1926.501(a)(2) · Fall protection in construction
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 10, 2001Closed
Citation 2, item 4
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4) · Ladders in construction
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 10, 2001Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.100 · Hard hats in construction

29 CFR 1926.100(a)

(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4)

(4) Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.

29 CFR 1926.153 · Liquefied petroleum gas (LP-Gas)

29 CFR 1926.304 · Woodworking tools

29 CFR 1926.404 · Ground-fault protection on job sites

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.701 · Concrete and Masonry Construction: general requirements

Other residential remodelers employers in District of Columbia

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in District of Columbia the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.