OSHA has inspected Orange County Fire Authority 23 times in California since 1998.
The latest one began on Oct 28, 2020 after an accident, in Irvine.
Those inspections ended with 20 citation items: 6 serious, 1 repeat and 13 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $105,390 and now stand at $70,040, 34% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for public administration employers since 2015 is $0, and Orange County Fire Authority averages $29,725 (2 cited inspections).
Orange County Fire Authority also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
California · latest 90 days of OSHA records
1,128employers cited
4 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Orange County Fire Authority and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Incident on Oct 26, 2020: Two employees are burned during wildland fire burn over
At 1:50 p.m. on October 26, 2020, fire fighters from the Orange County Fire Authority responded to a vegetation fire (known as the Silverado Fire). During suppression activities, two fire fighters were overrun by fire and subsequently transported to the hospital to treat burns. One fire fighter remained hospitalized for more than 100 days, while the second fire fighter remained hospitalized for more than 30 days.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3203(A)
Serious
$13,500
$1,350
Jul 2, 2021
Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3410(A)
Serious
$13,500
$10,800
Jul 2, 2021
Final
Citation 3, item 1
29 CFR 3410(B)
Serious
$13,500
$10,800
Jul 2, 2021
Final
Citation 4, item 1
29 CFR 3410(C)
Serious
$25,000
$18,000
Jul 2, 2021
Final
Citation 5, item 1
29 CFR 3410(E)
Serious
$25,000
$18,000
Jul 2, 2021
Final
Inspection 341572519 OPENED JUN 23, 2016Closed
Unprogrammed related · Partial · Safety · Local government · 1,300 employees at the site · Closed Aug 29, 2017
Incident on May 30, 2012: Worker fractures hip in fall when strap fitting comes loose
At approximately 12:10 a.m. on Wednesday, May 30, 2012, Employee #1 was working as a senior fleet services technician for a county fire authority. He repaired h eavy equipment, and he had been employed with this entity since 2006. On the day of the incident, had started his work shift at 10:30 p.m. He was moving tires f rom one fire truck to use on a relief fire truck, a process that is done at leas t monthly to ensure good tire rotation. He had loaded all four tires from fire t ruck T71 onto the bed of a utility truck in order to transfer the tires to the o ther fire truck. The utility truck was a pickup truck that had been modified wit h two "E-rails" or "E-tracks" at each side for securing winch straps. It also ha d a control to raise and lower the "Tommy Gate" lift gate. Employee #1 was stand ing on the elevated lift gate, which was approximately 37 inches (1 meter) above the ground. He was pulling on a Lift-All hold-down strap to tighten or cinch it through a cam buckle, when one end of the E-track fitting came loose from the E -track rail in the truck. Employee #1 lost his balance from the sudden release o f tension and fell backwards off the elevated lift gate. He landed on his right side and sustained injury to his leg and hip. He sustained a fractured hip that necessitated admission to the hospital for surgery. There were no witnesses to t he incident, as his coworkers and supervisor were working in other areas of the fleet maintenance garage. Nonetheless, they responded immediately when they hear d Employee #1 call out for help. The strap and rails were designed for 1,000 lbs . (4,448 newtons) working load and 3,000 lbs. (13,345 newtons) ultimate strength . Neither the strap nor rails failed. The employer has since reevaluated the pro cedure and has replaced the cam buckle-type strap with ratchet-type straps to el iminate the need to pull the strap to tighten it and to prevent a recurrence of this incident.
No citations from this inspection.
Inspection 315528711 OPENED JUN 15, 2012Closed
Unprogrammed related · Partial · Safety · Local government · 6 employees at the site · Closed Aug 20, 2015
Incident on Aug 24, 2011: Recruit firefighter sustains heat exhaustion
On August 24, 2011, Employee #1, a recruit firefighter with the Orange County Fi re Authority, was undergoing training to become a firefighter. At the end of the day, he reported to instructors that he was experiencing discomfort and cramps. Employee #1 was hospitalized for dehydration and heat exhaustion. He claimed to have been acclimated to higher temperatures and hydrated on the day of the inci dent.
No citations from this inspection.
Inspection 315525535 OPENED AUG 10, 2011Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · Local government · 20 employees at the site · Closed Aug 16, 2011
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2019, the Irvine site logged 295 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 1,460 workers: 14.3 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 5.5 for its industry. Those cases cost 6,425 days away from work.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Orange County Fire Authority
Irvine · 2019
1,460
295
115
14.3
5.5
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.